Pages

Friday, May 3, 2024

Ben Meiselas: 'Donald Trump Top Aide STICKS THE DAGGER in Him At Trial'

Source:Meidas Touch left to right: Donald Trump's longtime communications assistant Hope Hicks & Defendant Don himself.

"MeidasTouch host Ben Meiselas reports on the devastating trial testimony by Donald Trump’s former top aide Hope Hicks." 

From the Meidas Touch

"Taking the stand in Trump's criminal trial, the ex-White House aide was reunited with her former boss, whom she said she hadn't seen in almost two years.

Former White House communications director Hope Hicks took the stand Friday in Donald Trump's New York criminal trial, a tense reunion for the former president and a woman who was once one of his closest aides.

"I'm really nervous," Hicks said as she took the stand as the ninth witness to be called in the case, and led the jury through a dramatic inside account of Trump's reaction to the infamous "Access Hollywood" tape that nearly derailed his first presidential bid.

She later broke down in tears at the start of her cross-examination by Trump attorney Emil Bove, when he asked about the Trump family having given her an opportunity to work at their company, leading to a short recess while she composed herself.

Hicks started work at the Trump Organization in 2014 before going to work on Trump's 2016 campaign and then his administration. Another witness, former National Enquirer publisher David Pecker, said she was in and out of a key meeting he had with Trump and his then-lawyer Michael Cohen in 2015, where Pecker agreed to help them suppress stories that could hurt Trump's campaign.

Cohen and Pecker are key figures in Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg’s case against Trump. Prosecutors say the three men organized a scheme that resulted in Cohen’s paying adult film star Stormy Daniels $130,000 to keep quiet about a sexual encounter she said she had with Trump in 2006. Trump later repaid Cohen in payments the DA says he falsely classified as legal expenses.

Trump pleaded not guilty to all 34 counts of falsifying business records. He has also denied having an affair with Daniels or another woman at the center of the case, former Playboy model Karen McDougal.

Hicks said Friday she has not spoken to Trump in almost two years.

She told the jury when she worked on Trump's campaign as his press secretary beginning in 2015, they would speak multiple times a day. Asked how large their press team was, Hicks said, "It was just me and Mr. Trump" until the later stages of his successful run, and she lauded his communications and branding skills.

"We were all just following his lead," she said.

Asked if she was in and out of a meeting with Pecker, she said she didn't remember but that it was "possible." She said she remembered Trump praising articles the Enquirer had done slamming his then-Republican rivals Ben Carson and Sen. Ted Cruz. She recalled that Trump called an article that tried to link Cruz's father to the Kennedy assassination "great reporting." Pecker testified that the piece was a concoction.

She said the size of the staff had grown by Oct. 2016, which is when she got an email from a Washington Post reporter with an "extremely urgent request" for comment on what subsequently became known as the "Access Hollywood" tape. The 2005 hot mic recording includes audio of Trump making lewd comments about women and saying he can grope them without their consent.

Hicks said she was "very concerned" by the email — both about the contents "and the lack of time to respond." She said she forwarded the request on to campaign leadership, including Kellyanne Conway, Steve Bannon and Jason Miller. She eventually found them altogether preparing for Trump's debate with Hillary Clinton.

She said Trump asked her what was going on, and she read the email aloud to him. She said she had a vague recollection of starting to read the transcript of his remarks that the Post reporter had sent, and that Trump then he read the rest of it to himself. “That doesn’t sound like something I would say,” she recalled him saying.

When they began talking about how to respond, Trump suggested the tape was not a big deal and “not anything to get so upset over,” Hicks said, and he called it “pretty standard stuff for two guys” talking.

Hicks said she was "stunned" when she eventually heard the tape and had a sense it would be a "massive story" and a "crisis."

The campaign put out a short statement from Trump calling the remarks "locker room banter." He later tweeted a video statement, where he said “I said it, I was wrong, and I apologize,” before going on to attack Clinton." 

From NBC News

As I wrote about this last week: 

"They show that he had an affair with Stormy Daniels and perhaps Karen McDougal as well, but that he not just tried to cover up those affairs with hush money. 

And not just try to prevent his wife Melania and his son Barron from finding out about these affairs, but to prevent the voters, especially Independents, as well as Republican college educated, urban and suburban women from finding out about these affairs, before they voted in 2016

As well as covered up these affairs and did that with illegal political contributions to his his own 2016 presidential campaign, that he didn't even report, which is another crime in New York 

They can convict Defendant Don of election interference as well, which is a felony in New York. 

And this David Pecker-Michael Cohen link with the hush money payments is a direct way to move the ball down that road."


As I wrote about this on Tuesday:  

"So according to the Meidas Touch, (at least) Hope Hicks not only knew about the adulterous affairs that Donald Trump had with both Stephanie Clifford (perhaps better known as Stormy Daniels) and Karen McDougal. And perhaps was in on setting up the payoffs to both women to keep them both quiet before the 2016 presidential election. 

If that's true, they now have two credible witnesses before they get to McDougal and Clifford, that these affairs not just happened, the women were not just paid off, but paid off to keep them quiet before the 2016 presidential election. And if that's the case, they now have him on two felonies. And you just need the paperwork, the bank records, the phone calls, texts, emails, etc, to prove this story." 


As I wrote about this yesterday: 

"We already now know that the payoffs not just happened from Donald J. Trump to Stephanie Clifford (perhaps better known as Stormy Daniels) and Karen McDougal, but that Donald Trump knew about them, and they were done to prevent the women from coming out with their stories right before the 2016 elections. And it's not just David Pecker who exposed that evidence, (pun intended) but Keith Davidson this week, as well as Hope Hicks being a key witness to this illegal scheme. Now it's just a matter of proving that DJT had these affairs in the 1st place with Clifford and McDougal."  


As my colleague Fred Schneider wrote earlier today: 

"As Kire believe already talked about and even mentioned this, Hope Hicks establishes that the Trump Campaign in 2016, including herself, were focused on not just how the Access Hollywood tape would affect their campaign, perhaps especially with Independents and Republican women. But also how the alleged affairs with Stephanie Clifford (also known as Stormy Daniels) and Karen McDougal would affect their campaign as well. Not how this affect Donald Trump's wife and son. Which really is the only reason why these payoffs were made. And I'm sure Donald didn't want Melania leaving him before the election that year. But that just might be a guess on my part. 

I was watching CNN's late coverage of this trial last night. And at least one of their lawyers, I think including Ellie Honig was arguing that the prosecution doesn't need to establish that the affairs even happened. Just the payoffs and coverups. But as New York defense attorney Arthur Aidala (whose no fan of this case) argued the defense can argue that Donald Trump was being extorted by Keith Davidson and his two female clients. If they establish that the affairs actually happened and can prove that, there goes the defense's only good argument, that their client was being extorted by Davidson, Clifford, and McDougal." 


Again we're not lawyers here and I don't want to call this: "Game, set, match" (or whatever the legal term is for game over) but the Manhattan prosecutors have already established that the payments to Stephanie Clifford (also known as Stormy Daniels) and Karen McDougal not only happened, by why they happened, that Donald Trump paid them and why he paid them. 

DJT didn't want these stories breaking that he had adulterous affairs while his wife Melania was pregnant with his son Barron back in 2006, coming out right before the 2016 presidential election. And Hope Hicks testified today that Michael Cohen not only gave the the women the money but Donald Trump knew about the payments and he did that for him. And we also know that Donald Trump paid Cohen back for those payments.

Now I think the prosecution has to also establish the affairs, so the defense can't argue that Defendant Don (as The New Democrat as politely as we can all Donald Trump) that he was being extorted by these two women and their lawyer Keith Davidson. And I don't see how you do that with out Stephanie Clifford and Karen McDougal, since these affairs happened, (and I believe they did) they were obviously there and you would think they would be able to collaborate them. 

You can also see this post on WordPress.

CNN: Hope Hicks Testifies & Judge Merchan Corrects Donald Trump

Source:CNN covering Donald Trump's longtime assistant Hope Hick's testimony.

"Hope Hicks, once considered one of Donald Trump’s closest confidantes and most trusted aides, is questioned by prosecutor Matthew Colangelo about her role as Trump’s press secretary during the 2016 campaign and the release of the “Access Hollywood” tape in the months before the election." 

From CNN

‘This was a crisis’: Hope Hicks testifies about Trump campaign response to Access Hollywood tape

Donald Trump’s former communications director testifies that the 2016 campaign wasn’t sure how to respond to Access Hollywood tape, ‘everyone was still absorbing the shock’

Trump trial continues with judge dismissing claims that ex-president can’t testify

Hugo Lowell: "Prosecutors elicited from Hope Hicks just how bad the Trump 2016 campaign viewed the Access Hollywood tape, as they tee up their case that after that story broke, the campaign needed to suppress any further negative stories about Trump and women." 

While Hope Hicks cut a nervous figure as she took the witness stand Friday, the former top Trump aide seemed to appreciate the absurdity of this situation.

The prosecutor asked Hicks about text messages she exchanged with Michael Cohen after the Wall Street Journal published an article describing how AMI bought stories about Karen McDougal and Stormy Daniels, and then opted out of publishing them; this report ran on 4 November 2016.

When she read Cohen’s missive about the article, where he called it “poorly written and I dot see it getting much play,” Hicks chuckled. “A little irony there,” she said, again laughing softly. “ I said I agree with that.” 


As my colleague Kire Schneider pointed out about this last week:

"They show that he had an affair with Stormy Daniels and perhaps Karen McDougal as well, but that he not just tried to cover up those affairs with hush money. 

And not just try to prevent his wife Melania and his son Barron from finding out about these affairs, but to prevent the voters, especially Independents, as well as Republican college educated, urban and suburban women from finding out about these affairs, before they voted in 2016

As well as covered up these affairs and did that with illegal political contributions to his his own 2016 presidential campaign, that he didn't even report, which is another crime in New York 

They can convict Defendant Don of election interference as well, which is a felony in New York. 

And this David Pecker-Michael Cohen link with the hush money payments is a direct way to move the ball down that road." 


As my colleague Kire Schneider pointed out about this on Tuesday: 

"So according to the Meidas Touch, (at least) Hope Hicks not only knew about the adulterous affairs that Donald Trump had with both Stephanie Clifford (perhaps better known as Stormy Daniels) and Karen McDougal. And perhaps was in on setting up the payoffs to both women to keep them both quiet before the 2016 presidential election. 

If that's true, they now have two credible witnesses before they get to McDougal and Clifford, that these affairs not just happened, the women were not just paid off, but paid off to keep them quiet before the 2016 presidential election. And if that's the case, they now have him on two felonies. And you just need the paperwork, the bank records, the phone calls, texts, emails, etc, to prove this story." 


As my colleague Kire Schneider pointed out about this yesterday: 

"We already now know that the payoffs not just happened from Donald J. Trump to Stephanie Clifford (perhaps better known as Stormy Daniels) and Karen McDougal, but that Donald Trump knew about them, and they were done to prevent the women from coming out with their stories right before the 2016 elections. And it's not just David Pecker who exposed that evidence, (pun intended) but Keith Davidson this week, as well as Hope Hicks being a key witness to this illegal scheme. Now it's just a matter of proving that DJT had these affairs in the 1st place with Clifford and McDougal." 


As Kire I believe already talked about and even mentioned this, Hope Hicks establishes that the Trump Campaign in 2016, including herself, were focused on not just how the Access Hollywood tape would affect their campaign, perhaps especially with Independents and Republican women. But also how the alleged affairs with Stephanie Clifford (also known as Stormy Daniels) and Karen McDougal would affect their campaign as well. Not how this affects Donald Trump's wife and son. Which really is the only reason why these payoffs were made. And I'm sure Donald didn't want Melania leaving him before the election that year. But that just might be a guess on my part. 

I was watching CNN's late coverage of this trial last night. And at least one of their lawyers, I think including Ellie Honig was arguing that the prosecution doesn't need to establish that the affairs even happened. Just the payoffs and coverups. But as New York defense attorney Arthur Aidala (whose no fan of this case) argued the defense can argue that Donald Trump was being extorted by Keith Davidson and his two female clients. If they establish that the affairs actually happened and can prove that, there goes the defense's only good argument, that their client was being extorted by Davidson, Clifford, and McDougal. 

"Judge Juan Merchan began day 11 of Donald Trump’s hush money trial by correcting the former president. The previous day Trump claimed the gag order prevented him from testifying, but that is not true. Judge Merchan reiterated in court that Trump has the absolute right to testify if he chooses." 

Source:CNN- left to right: NYC Criminal Judge Juan Merchan & Defendant Don.

From CNN

Anderson Cooper said last night that Donald Trump was just trying to lay the groundwork for why he won't be testifying in his own trial. And he's basically just lying right now (unless he never took social studies and law at any point in school, or has slept his way though all his court cases) about not being allowed to testify. As New York defense attorney Arthur Aidala also said last night, we learn in grade school that we all have a constitutional right to participate in our own criminal defense and testify on our own behalf.

You can also see this post on WordPress.

Thursday, May 2, 2024

Ben Meiselas: 'Donald Trump Denies FALLING ASLEEP As Witness SLAUGHTERS Him'

Source:Meidas Touch looking at Sleepy Defendant Don.

"MeidasTouch host Ben Meiselas reports on the Donald Trump criminal trial where a key prosecution witness Keith Davidson buried Trump and Trump responded by posting that he is not falling asleep at trial." 

From the Meidas Touch 

"Keith Davidson, a Los Angeles-based lawyer, told jurors about how he represented Stormy Daniels in talks with Michael Cohen, then Trump's attorney, toward the end of the 2016 presidential campaign. Daniels ultimately agreed to keep her story under wraps in exchange for $130,000, paid by Cohen. 

In court on Thursday, Davidson said Cohen was "depressed and despondent" in the weeks after the election, when Trump declined to bring him to Washington to serve in his new administration. He also told jurors what unfolded behind the scenes when the Daniels payment came to light in 2018, when he fielded angry phone calls from Cohen threatening legal action."

From CBS News

Just one point about the "Sleepy Don" story first: I would love to know who these people who are being polled by all of these national, mainstream media organizations, (perhaps including CBS News) who say that Donald J. Trump is better suited mentally and has better mental fitness and mental health than Joseph R. Biden. 

Are these companies just polling senior centers or something? Perhaps just people who take 6 hour naps everyday and sleep 10 hours a night every night. Maybe they're polling people who are napping at home, when Donald Trump is napping in court. So obviously they're not aware of it. And maybe the only news they get is from television and the nightly newscasts anyway. And that's not to mention all of Defendant Don's comedic (if not crazy) social media posts.

As I wrote about this on Tuesday: 

"So according to the Meidas Touch, (at least) Hope Hicks not only knew about the adulterous affairs that Donald Trump had with both Stephanie Clifford (perhaps better known as Stormy Daniels) and Karen McDougal. And perhaps was in on setting up the payoffs to both women to keep them both quiet before the 2016 presidential election. 

If that's true, they now have two credible witnesses before they get to McDougal and Clifford, that these affairs not just happened, the women were not just paid off, but paid off to keep them quiet before the 2016 presidential election. And if that's the case, they now have him on two felonies. And you just need the paperwork, the bank records, the phone calls, texts, emails, etc, to prove this story." 


We already now know that the payoffs not just happened from Donald J. Trump to Stephanie Clifford (perhaps better known as Stormy Daniels) and Karen McDougal, but that Donald Trump knew about them, and they were done to prevent the women from coming out with their stories right before the 2016 elections. And it's not just David Pecker who exposed that evidence, (pun intended) but Keith Davidson this week, as well as Hope Hicks being a key witness to this illegal scheme. Now it's just a matter of proving that DJT had these affairs in the 1st place with Clifford and McDougal. 

You can also see this post on WordPress.

Inside With Jen Psaki: Former Donald Trump Aid Sarah Matthews On Why She's Voting For Joe Biden

Source:MSNBC talking to one of President Donald J. Trump's communication aides Sarah Matthews.

"Former Trump Deputy Press Secretary Sarah Matthews and The Atlantic staff writer McKay Coppins join Jen Psaki to discuss Donald Trump's hold on the Republican party despite his legal troubles." 

From MSNBC 

Sarah Matthews on Bill Barr: "She pointed to Barr’s warning from May 2023 when he said: “You may want his policies, but Trump will not deliver Trump policies. He will deliver chaos and, if anything, lead to a backlash that will set his policies much further back than they otherwise would be.”

“So, even if you want a conservative agenda, Trump is not the person who will deliver that,” Matthews summarized." 


McKay Coppins on Bill Barr: "I think there's this idea in both the Democratic Party and Republican Party, as bad as Donald Trump might be, as authoritarian as he might be, giving up power to the other side by not not voting for your own candidates, is even worst. There's this idea in the Republican Party right now during the Trump era, that giving up power to the other side, is even worst than voting for Donald Trump." 

As authoritarian and as bad as Donald Trump might be, he's not Joe Biden, he's not a Democrat. That seems to be Bill Barr's only reason to vote for Donald Trump again.. Imagine two serial killers and one of them says something like: "I'm not as bad as the other guy. He murdered women and children. I just murdered gay men."

This justification by Bill Barr for voting for Donald Trump right now, is that Joe Biden is worst than an authoritarian or wannabe dictator. Even though its President Biden who signed off on the foreign aid package that was finally passed in Congress, that aides Ukraine, Israel, and Taiwan, who are fighting to prevent authoritarians from taking over their countries. While former President Trump and his MAGA cult in the House, opposed that package all the way. I mean even if Joe Biden is reelected and with a Democratic Congress, if they do a bad job, or at least are unpopular in 2025-26, they'll lose Congress, or at least the House or Senate in 2026. 

As my colleague Kire Schneider wrote about Bill Barr on Monday: 

"Peter Wehner makes at least two excellent points here about Donald Trump. The 1st one about former Attorney General Bill Barr, who went on CNN last Friday night to talk to Kaitlan Collins about why he can't vote for Joe Biden. I think she did an excellent job in getting him to say exactly why he won't vote for Joe Biden for any reasons. He didn't hold back on that. 

I'm sure there are Democrats like this as well. Just look at the so-called Squad and the so-called Congressional Progressive Caucus in the House, who probably for no reasons whatsoever could vote for a Republican. Even a Republican running against a Democrat whose literally dead. But there are a wing of true Conservative Republicans, who can't vote for Democrats, simply because they can't live with themselves helping to create a unified Democratic government (White House & Congress) because they believe that would be bad for the country. That is a type of Republican that I think Bill Barr is." 


The point here is that Bill Barr is more interested in the future of the Republican and how much power they'll have in Washington post-2024, then he's interested in the future of the country. I know this is easy for me to say as someone whose still a registered Democrat. Even though I'm not a left-wing Democrat. But I'm center-right probably on most issues as a JFK Democrat, who would fit in well with the Republican Party of the 1960s and perhaps even 1970s, than with the left-wing of the Democratic Party today. 

Bill Barr has no credible reasons for voting for Donald Trump. But he doesn't need one either. Hell, politicians get elected and reelected all the time simply because they're up to date on pop culture and routinely drop pop culture references off the cuff, speak primarily in political pop culture sound bites and catch phrases, and own the right smart phones, etc. Meaning voters, especially young voters, think they're cool. Even if they can't even name one of their public policy positions on anything. Even to get themselves out of jail. 

So why not get elected to office simply because of your party registration? Even as Bill Barr said so himself: "Donald Trump is someone who should never even be near The White House again."

You can also see this post on WordPress.

Wednesday, May 1, 2024

CSPAN: House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries VS Representative Marjorie T. Greene: Motion To Vacate

Source:CSPAN- U.S. House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (Democrat, New York)

"House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries: "Marjorie Taylor Greene is the star of the show. The show is called Republicans Gone Wild. It is undermining the well-being of the American people and preventing us from delivering real and meaningful results on the issues that matter." "He continues, "House Republicans are either unwilling or unable to get Marjorie Taylor Greene and the extreme MAGA Republicans under control, and so it's going to take a bipartisan coalition and partnership to accomplish that objective." 

From CSPAN 

"Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-GA): "I think the American people need to see a recorded vote...So next week, I am going to be calling this motion to vacate. Absolutely calling it." Full video here:CSPAN." 

Source:CSPAN- U.S. Representative Marjorie T. Greene (MAGA, Georgia)

From CSPAN 

As I wrote about this crazy story back in back in March: 

"As the ABC News Congressional reporter said in the video: when you file a privileged motion to vacate the Speaker of the House, the House has to vote on that motion within two days, regardless of who files the motion and whether they're a majority or minority member of the House. 

The Greene motion is not a privileged motion. So, she might just be putting Speaker Mike Johnson "on notice here", or she might done her own whip count and can count high enough to see that most of the House Republicans would vote against it and a lot of House Democrats as well. And she doesn't want to look even dumber and crazier than she already does. But that's just my theory. " 


Just a quick point about this first: the Greene motion in the House from March wasn't a privileged motion. Meaning the House never had to vote on it. What's different now, is that Representative Taylor Greene's motion is now a privileged motion. She filed it today and the House has to vote on it next week. Even if she's the only member of the House who votes for it. Well, her, Representative Tom Massie, Representative Matt Gaetz, and perhaps Representative Chip Roy, and maybe the so-called "Squad" out of 431-432 current U.S. Representatives. 

But to go to what House Minority Jeffries said: "Marjorie Taylor Greene is the star of the show. The show is called Republicans Gone Wild." As I mentioned a couple weeks ago about Hakeem Jeffries: 

"Hakeem Jeffries has an excellent, pretty quick, sense of humor. At least political wit. And if you follow him on social media, you really see that everyday. He called House Republicans "Moscow Marjorie Taylor Greene", Matt Gaetz, and Paul Gosar "quite a group" and did that with a smirk on his face. Meaning, that wasn't a complement. “Quite a group” is a step down from “distinguished gentleman” or “distinguished gentlelady”. But 2, he was also holding back. But 2, he was holding back." 


The only thing that I would amend about the Jeffries statement here is that this is not the "Republicans Gone Wild". Yes, they're all registered Republicans. But you could register at a lovers nest under an assume name and then later claim that you were never actually registered at that hotel, because you didn't use your real name. Possible titles for this political reality TV show are: 

Not even sure if this real life, political reality TV show, where Marjorie Taylor Greene who at the very least is the Washington producer, director, and star of, is: "MAGA Gone Wild" 

It just might be more like: "MAGA Militants Gone Wild" where some of them are actually armed. 

Or: "Escaped Mental Patients Invade Washington To Take a Bite Out of Sanity." As if there are not enough crazy people already in Washington. 

As far as Representative Greene's point about Speaker Mike Johnson and Minority Leader Jeffries setting up a "uni-party": A uni-party to do what: 

Prevent the government from shutting down? 

Prevent the government from defaulting? 

Helping our allies fend off fascist dictators from stealing their land and ethnic-cleansing them? 

Does Representative Greene really want the whole country to see how stupid and crazy her own colleagues, even in the House Republican Conference, think of her? It's not just the House Democrats and the mainstream media who view her as a crazy idiot, who should be sent back to her room to get the help that she needs. 

You can also see this post on WordPress.

Erin Burnett OutFront: The Keith Davidson Testimony

Source:CNN- left to right: Defendant Don & CNN hard news anchor Erin Burnett.

"CNN's Erin Burnett describes what she witnessed as she sat in the courtroom during former President Trump's criminal hush money trial in New York." 

From CNN

As my colleague Kire Schneider wrote about this last week: 

"Donald Trump is not being prosecuted for adultery in Manhattan. I mean think about it, this is Manhattan, if anything adultery is encouraged here. If you are not rich and divorce by the time you are 40, if you are a man who doesn't have kids with multiple women, by the time you are 40, you are considered to be some outsider, who should go move to Cleveland or some place. You are not considered a real Manhattanite, certainly not a real New Yorker. 

Donald Trump is not being prosecuted for paying off a porn chick, who he was having an affair with, when his wife Melania was pregnant with his son Barron. Hell, Defendant Don is not even being charged with cheating on his wife, while she was pregnant with their son. Again, this is Manhattan, they're not looking for saints and for people who are playing to make it to Heaven. I'm having a little fun with this, but you get the idea... 


We're making this point very strong about what this Donald Trump trial is about, because we don't want our readers or anyone else to think that this trial is something that it's not. The Donald Trump Hush Money Trial (as some people call it) is not some tabloid magazine that simply makes its money by embarrassing professional celebrities, whether it's Donald J. Trump or anyone else. And Donald Trump is not even the star, let alone publisher of this fictional publication. 

This trial about election interference and false business records, that Donald J. Trump is being tried for, that his colleagues have been alleged to have work with him on, to prevent two devastating stories from coming out in the public against Mr. Trump, just before the 2016 presidential election. 

And according to CNN anchor Erin Burnett, who I believe is one of the 3 best anchors at CNN right now, because she is a professional reporter with both a business and Washington background in hard news, whose known Donald Trump for perhaps 20 years now, from her time covering Wall Street for CNBC in the 2000s, who knows Donald Trump about as well as any hard news mainstream journalist, she makes a very good point here about how seriously this jury is taking this case right now. 

Erin Burnett  gave excellent details, along with the lawyers who are covering this case for CNN, including one of their legal correspondents Paula Reid, about how seriously this jury took Keith Davidson's testimony yesterday. 

You can also see this post on WordPress.

Tuesday, April 30, 2024

Michael Popok: 'Donald Trump SECRET Phone Call Revealed, SINKS HIM in Criminal Trial'

Source:Meidas Touch- left to right: Defendant Don & one of his longtime assistants Hope Hicks.

"Watch Hope Hicks as she “dumps on Trump” at his ongoing NY criminal trial. Michael Popok analyzes a new previously unknown SECRET PHONE CALL set up by Trump among the National Enquirer publisher, then White House press secretary and now Arkansas Governor Sarah Huckabee Sanders and Trump’s Melania-twin and White House coms director Hope Hicks, in which they conspired TO COMMIT MORE ELECTION CRIMES BY PAYING playboy playmate Karen McDougal EVEN MORE MONEY to keep her from doing damage to Trump’s REELECTION bid." 

From the Meidas Touch

As I wrote about this last week: 

"As someone who is looking at this case as a non-lawyer, I think the Manhattan District Attorney has a very specific mission to accomplish here. Not just get a conviction of Donald J. Trump, but convict him of a felony, multiple felonies... 


So according to the Meidas Touch, (at least) Hope Hicks not only knew about the adulterous affairs that Donald Trump had with both Stephanie Clifford (perhaps better known as Stormy Daniels) and Karen McDougal. And perhaps was in on setting up the payoffs to both women to keep them both quiet before the 2016 presidential election. 

If that's true, they now have two credible witnesses before they get to McDougal and Clifford, that these affairs not just happened, the women were not just paid off, but paid off to keep them quiet before the 2016 presidential election. And if that's the case, they now have him on two felonies. And you just need the paperwork, the bank records, the phone calls, texts, emails, etc, to prove this story. 

You can also see this post on WordPress.

John F. Kennedy Liberal Democrat

John F. Kennedy Liberal Democrat
Source: U.S. Senator John F. Kennedy in 1960